Decision Intelligence: A TL;DR From Our Launch Event

Last week, we introduced a shift we believe is long overdue: Decision Intelligence for Go-To-Market teams.

Not as a new dashboard.
Not as another AI assistant.
But as a different way decisions actually get made when answers can’t wait.

If you missed the live event, this post captures the essence of what we launched, why it matters now, and how it changes the way GTM teams operate.

‍

‍

Why This Moment Matters

Go-to-market teams are not struggling because they lack data.

They are struggling because decisions are taking too long, confidence erodes before alignment forms, and market windows close before teams feel ready to act. In practice, the average GTM decision now touches eight or more tools and takes weeks to resolve, while the opportunity to act often closes in days.

This is not a tooling problem.
It’s a decision problem.

Executives no longer accept “optimize later.” They expect:

• Alignment across Marketing, Sales, and Finance
• A shared decision model instead of competing dashboards
• Accountability to outcomes, not activity

That expectation is what led us here.

‍What We Mean by Decision Intelligence

Decision Intelligence starts with a simple shift in framing.

Traditional BI answers what happened.
Attribution tools argue over who gets credit.

Decision Intelligence focuses on:

• Why performance is changing
• What actually drives outcomes
• What should happen next

Instead of starting with dashboards, queries, or assumptions, Decision Intelligence starts with a business goal and works backward to determine what deserves attention. That distinction matters when teams need to act, not analyze.

This is the difference between reporting and decision support.

What We Launched

At the core of the launch was a new operating model for GTM decisions.

Amoeba is not built to analyze data.
It is built to decide what deserves attention.

The system introduces what we call a Decision Orchestration Layer; a living system that ties goals to insights, insights to recommendations, and recommendations to continuous monitoring.

In practice, that means:

• Goals anchor the system, not metrics
• Signals are evaluated based on impact, not volume
• Context is preserved across teams and time
• Assumptions are questioned continuously, not reinforced

This compresses decision cycles from weeks to minutes, without asking teams to clean data first or rebuild their analytics stack.

What We Demoed

During the live demo, we walked through what Decision Intelligence looks like when it’s operational.

Rather than exploring dashboards, the system:

• Surfaces the drivers that matter most to a goal
• Explains why performance is moving, across functions
• Guides exploration without overwhelming the user
• Produces recommendations framed as bodies of work, not one-off tasks
• Monitors progress continuously as conditions change

A key theme was reducing cognitive load. The system highlights what to act on, what to ignore, and when assumptions need revisiting. Users can explore deeper when needed, but they are never left guessing where to look next.

The demo also showed how Decision Intelligence meets people where they are (including voice-based daily briefings and proactive alerts) so insights don’t live trapped inside another tool.

Panel Takeaways: What Leaders Are Seeing in the Wild

Our panel discussion with Levi Worts, Senior AI Marketing Strategist at SUSE, Daniel Pinkston, Performance Marketing Manager at Hearth, Johan Abadie, Head of Demand Gen and Revenue Strategy at Sales Intel, and Dee Acosta, Head of Sales at Metadata, all reinforced why this shift is happening now.

1. Dashboards create the illusion of control, not decision speed.
Several panelists noted that dashboards mostly show where the business has been, not where it is heading, leading to delayed reactions and missed windows.

2. Attribution is often a distraction at scale.
Attribution debates create silos and slow teams down. Growth comes from alignment, not credit assignment.

3. More data does not mean more clarity.
Teams are overwhelmed by signals without context. Without causality and interaction modeling, leaders default to gut decisions anyway.

4. Leadership still matters.
Decision Intelligence doesn’t replace judgment. It reduces friction so leaders can act with confidence instead of paralysis.

Across roles, enterprise GTM leaders, performance marketers, revenue strategists, and sales executives, the same pattern emerged: decisions stall not because teams lack insight, but because they lack shared context and trust.

Why This Matters for GTM Teams

Decision Intelligence changes how teams operate day to day.

For GTM leaders, it means setting goals once and keeping teams focused on what actually moves them.

For Revenue Ops, it replaces manual reconciliation and conflicting narratives with a shared operating layer.

For Finance and executives, it surfaces revenue risk earlier and grounds tradeoffs in the same context across functions.

The result is fewer surprises, faster reallocation, and decisions leaders can defend, not just consume.

What Comes Next

Decision Intelligence is not a one-time launch. It’s an operating shift.

As businesses grow more complex and market windows continue to compress, the advantage will belong to teams that reduce insight latency and increase decision velocity.

If you want to go deeper:

• Watch the full event recording
• Read the Decision Intelligence manifesto
• Explore how Decision Intelligence fits into your GTM motion

Because when answers can’t wait, how decisions get made matters more than how data gets reported.

‍